International Journal of Transportation Engineering

International Journal of Transportation Engineering

An Assessment of Subjective Sidewalk Attributes and Trip Factors on Walking in Neighborhood

Document Type : Research Paper

Author
Department of Engineering, Kermanshah University of Technology, Kermanshah, Iran
Abstract
Walkability index is widely utilized based on objective attributes to assess potential of walking. However, researches discussed that objective attributes are self-evaluated and hence subjective measurements are required to better evaluate walkability. This study claims that self-evaluation of objective attributes differs among mandatory and non-mandatory trips. This suggest that while increase of walkability either objective or subjective potentially increase walking, it does not necessarily change behavior of mode choice in peak-time mandatory trips and hence may not be helpful for solving traffic problems. As a result, a more precise study is required if a more normative set of policy making is aimed.
A data collection was conducted in May 2023 in Kermanshah, Iran. A total of 623 participants answered a paper questionnaire. Two logistic regression models were developed to reveal the effective variables on walking choice for mandatory and non-mandatory trips. Results explored that safety, slope, pavement, tree existence and connectivity significantly affect walking choice in mandatory trips. Whereas non-mandatory trips are under the influence of safety, slope, pavement, tree existence, connectivity, furnish and width. Overall evaluating of the result suggests that encouraging more people to walk for mandatory (work and educational) trips requires a more comprehensive plan including diverse strategies beyond sidewalks enhancement.
Keywords

  • Abu-Eisheh, S.; Kuckshinrichs, W.; Dwaikat, A. Strategic Planning for Sustainable Transportation in Developing Countries: The Role of Vehicles. Transp. Res. Procedia 2020, 48, 3019–3036.

 

 

  • Basu N., Oviedo-Trespalacios O., King M., Kamruzzaman Md., Haque Md. M. (2022) “The influence of the built environment on pedestrians’ perceptions of attractiveness, safety and security”, Journal of Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 87, pp. 203-218, ISSN 1369-8478, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.03.006.
  • Blečić, I., Congiu, T., Fancello, G., & Trunfio, G. A. (2020). Planning and Design Support Tools for Walkability: A Guide for Urban Analysts. Sustainability, 12(11), 4405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114405.

 

  • Christiansen L. B., Toftager M., Schipperijn J., Ersbøll A. K., Giles-Corti B., Troelsen, J. (2014). “School site walkability and active school transport–association, mediation and moderation.” Journal of transport geography, Vol. 34, pp. 7-15.

 

  • Ehteshamrad S., Saffarzadeh M., Mamdoohi A., Nordfjærn T. (2022) “Behavior of parents and children in the way they use public transport. A case study of Iranian households.” Journal of Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 10, NO. 1, pp. 454-462, ISSN 2213-624X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.006.

 

  • Ewing, R., & Handy, S. L. (2009). “Measuring the Unmeasurable: Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability” Journal of Urban Design, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800802451155.

 

 

 

  • Gao W., Qian Y., Chen H., Zhong Z., Zhou M., Aminpour F. (2022) “Assessment of sidewalk walkability: Integrating objective and subjective measures of identical context-based sidewalk features” Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 87, ISSN 2210-6707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104142.

 

  • Gebel, K., Bauman, A. E., Sugiyama, T., & Owen, N. (2011) “Mismatch between perceived and objectively assessed neighborhood walkability attributes: Prospective relationships with walking and weight gain” Journal of Health and Place. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.12.008.

 

 

  • Guzman L.A., Arellana J., Castro W. F. (2022) “Desirable streets for pedestrians: Using a street-level index to assess walkability” Journal of Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,Vol. 111, 103462, ISSN 1361-9209, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103462.

 

 

  • Labdaoui K., Mazouz S., Moeinaddini M., Cools M., Teller J. (2021) “The Street Walkability and Thermal Comfort Index (SWTCI): A new assessment tool combining street design measurements and thermal comfort” Journal of Science of The Total Environment, Vol 795, 148663, ISSN 0048-9697, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148663.

 

  • Lee J., Park S. (2022) “Investigating pedestrian connectivity in apartment complexes: a case study of Seoul and Singapore” Journal of Local Environment, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 697-711. DOI: 1080/13549839.2022.2068141.

 

  • Lee J., Park S. (2023) “Current design guidelines’ streetscape improvement for visual perception and walkability: A case study of Sejong City, Republic of Korea” Journal of Frontiers of Architectural Research, ISSN 2095-2635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2022.11.002.

 

 

  • Leslie E., Coffee N., Frank L., Owen N., Bauman A., Hugo G. (2007) “Walkability of local communities: using geographic information systems to objectively assess relevant environmental attributes” Journal of Health & place, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 111-122.

 

  • Li U., Yabuki N., Fukuda T. (2022) “Exploring the association between street built environment and street vitality using deep learning methods” Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 79, 103656, ISSN 2210-6707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103656.

 

 

  • Lucchesi S. T., Larranaga A. M., Ochoa J. A. A., Samios A. A. B., Cybis H. B. B. (2021) “The role of security and walkability in subjective wellbeing: A multigroup analysis among different age cohorts” Journal of Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 40, 100559, ISSN 2210-5395, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100559.

 

  • Lwin K. K., Murayama (2011) “Modelling of urban green space walkability: Eco-friendly walk score calculator” Journal of Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 408-420.

 

 

  • Mahapatra, G.D.; Mori, S.; Nomura, R. Universal Mobility in old core cities of India: People’s Perception. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4391.

 

  • Mayne D., Morgan G., Wilmore A., Bauman A., Jalaludin B., Bambrick H., Bennett C. (2012) “An objective index of walkability for the Sydney metropolitan region” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Vol.15, S32-S33.

 

- McMillan T. E. (2005) “Urban Form and a Child’s Trip to School: The Current Literature and a Framework for Future Research” Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 440– 456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412204274173.

 

 

  • Mertens L.,  Dyck D. V.,  Deforche B.,  Bourdeaudhuij I. D.,  Brondeel R.,  Cauwenberg J. V. (2019) “Individual, social, and physical environmental factors related to changes in walking and cycling for transport among older adults: A longitudinal study.” Journal of Health & Place, Vol. 55 , pp. 120-127

 

 

  • Nehme E.K., Oluyomi A.O., Calise T.V., Kohl H.W. (2016) “Environmental Correlates of Recreational Walking in the Neighborhood” American Journal of Health Promotion, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 139 - 148, DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.130531-QUAN-281, https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84975138627&doi=10.4278%2fajhp.130531-QUAN- 281&partnerID=40&md5=a9b216c1dc5831bf58f37600469fe328.
  • Peiravian , Derrible S., Ijaz, F. (2014). “Development and application of the Pedestrian Environment Index (PEI).” Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 39, pp. 73-84.

 

  • Qazimirsaeed, A.; Khosravi, H.; Rafieian, M.; Mirzahossein, H.; Forciniti, C. Walkability Policies in Developing Countries: What Do People Need and Prefer in Iran? Sustainability 2022, 14, 10808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su141710808.

 

 

 

  • Sabzali Yameqani, A., Alesheikh, A. A. (2015). “Development and evaluation of a walkability index (Case Study: districts of the Ghom city).” Journal of geomatics Science and Technology. Vol. 5, No. 1. Pp. 159-174.

 

  • Sabzali Yameqani A., Alesheikh A. A. (2019) “Predicting subjective measures of walkability index from objective measures using artificial neural networks” Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 48, 101560, ISSN 2210-6707, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101560.

 

  • Schlossberg, M. (2006) “From TIGER to audit instruments: Measuring neighborhood walkability with street data based on geographic information systems” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the transportation research board, Vol. 1982, 48-56.

 

  • Taleai M., Yameqani A. S. (2017). “Integration of GIS, remote sensing and Multi-Criteria Evaluation tools in the search for healthy walking paths” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, pp.1-13.

 

  • Weyman J., Raposo P., Cannata R., Oh J., Motz M., Gozdyra P. (2008) “Urban Environment and Walkability: Definition and Calculation of a Walkability Index for Toronto, Canada.” Canadian Diabetes Association Professional Conference and Annual Meetings. Canadian Diabetes Association Professional Conference and Annual Meetings Abstract Book, 22.

 

  • Winters M., Buehler R.,. Götschi, T. (2017) “Policies to Promote Active Travel: Evidence from Reviews of the Literature”. Curr Envir Health Rpt Vol.4, pp. 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0148-x.

 

  • World Health Organization. (2018) “Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world.” Geneva; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. ISBN 978-92-4-151418-7.

 

  • Zhou , He S., Cai  Y., Wang  M., Su  S. (2019) “Social inequalities in neighborhood visual walkability: Using Street View imagery and deep learning technologies to facilitate healthy city planning” Journal of Sustainable Cities and Society, 101605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101605.

 

  • Zhao P., Chung K., (2017) “Neighborhood environment walkability and health-related quality of life among older adults in Hong Kong “ Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 73 , pp. 182-186.