A Monte Carlo Simulation of Chain Reaction Rear End Potential Collisions on Freeways

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University

2 Research Scientist, Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research, Oslo, Norway


In recent research on modelling road collisions very little attention has been paid  to rear-end chain reaction collisions, which is characterized by more than two vehicles involved in a collision at the same time. The core aim of the present research is to develop a methodology to estimate such potential collision probabilities based on a proactive perspective, where deceleration rate to avoid collision is used as a surrogate safety measure. In a rear-end chain reaction collision the following driver’s response time and the vehicle’s maximum available deceleration rate are both assumed as stochastic causes of collision. To consider the uncertainty of variables in estimating the N-vehicle rear-end collision, a methodology based on Monte Carlo simulation is proposed. To show the applicability of the proposed methodology, the NGSIM trajectory database of I-80 interstate freeway is used. The probability density function for drivers’ response time is developed through the analysis of 1534 car following situations detected in 45 minutes of movement. The potential risk of two to five vehicle reaction collisions in a five vehicle platoon is estimated by running the simulation through 20 thousand substitutions of randomized generation values drawn from probability density function of response time and maximum available deceleration rate in a following outcome function. Results show that avoiding rear-end collision should be considered as a shared responsibility among the drivers in the platoon. As expected, the methodology considers probability of N vehicles colliding at the same time decreasing as N increases. N-vehicle collision is shown to be directly related to the clearance between the following vehicles within the platoon and the speed of individual vehicles as well as the drivers’ reaction time and the maximum deceleration rate available in individual vehicles. The proposed methodology considers all vehicles in the platoon to estimate the risk of potential chain reaction collisions, rather than just simply focusing only on the two leading and following vehicles. Therefore, the proposed methodology is believed to act more effectively than the ordinary methods, particularly if it is used to alarm drivers of vehicles synchronized based on vehicular ad hoc network (VANET) methodologies.


American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials [AASHTO] (2004) "AASHTO Green Book, Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets 2004", 5th ed., Washington: American Association of State Highway & Transportation.
- Amundsen, F.H, and C. Hydén (1977) “Proceedings of The First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts”,  In  Oslo, TTI, Oslo, Norway and LTH Lund, Sweden.
- Brackstone, Mark and Mike McDonald, Mike (1999) “Car-following: A historical review”, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2 (4): pp.181–96.
Cunto, Flavio, Craveiro, Jose and Saccomanno, Frank F. (2007) “Microlevel traffic simulation method for assessing crash potential at intersections”,  In . http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=802073.
- Cunto, Flávio and Saccomanno, Frank F. (2008) “Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40 (3): pp.1171–79.
- Davis, Gary A., Hourdos, John,  Xiong, Hui and Chatterjee, Indrajit (2011) “Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes”,  Accident Analysis & Prevention 43 (6): pp.1907–19.
- Davis, Gary A. and Swenson, Tait (2006) “Collective responsibility for freeway rear-ending accidents?: An application of probabilistic causal models”, Accident Analysis & Prevention 38 (4): pp.728–36.
- Del Castillo, J. M., Pintado, P. and Benitez, F. G. (1994) “The reaction time of drivers and the stability of traffic flow”, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 28 (1): pp.35–60.
- Federal Highway Administration [FHWA] (2006) “Interstate 80 Freeway dataset fact sheet”, FHWA HRT-06-137. United States. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/operations/06137/.
- Guido, Giuseppe, Saccomanno, Frank; Vitale, Alessandro; Astarita, Vittorio and Festa, Demetrio (2010) “Comparing safety performance measures obtained from video capture data”, Journal of Transportation Engineering 1 (1): pp.165–165.
- Hauer, Ezra and Garder, Per  (1986) “Research into the validity of the traffic conflicts technique”,  Accident Analysis & Prevention 18 (6): pp. 471–81.
-James, F. (1980) “Monte Carlo theory and practice”, Reports on Progress in Physics, 43 (9): pp.1145.
-Laureshyn, Aliaksei  (2010) “Application of automated video analysis to road user behaviour”, Ph.D. dissertation, Sweden: Lund University.
-Laureshyn, Aliaksei, Åse Svensson, and Christer Hydén (2010) “Evaluation of traffic safety, based on micro-level behavioural data: Theoretical framework and first implementation”, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42 (6): pp.1637–46.
-Lord, Dominique and Fred Mannering (2010) “The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives”, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 44 (5): pp.291–305.
-Mamdoohi, Amir Reza, Mohsen Fallah Zavareh, Christer Hydén, and Trond Nordfjærn (2014) “Comparative analysis of safety performance indicators based on inductive loop detector data”, PROMET - Traffic&Transportation 26 (2): pp.139–49.
National Generation Simulation (NGISM) Programme Home Page (2013) Accessed December 26. http://ngsim-community.org/index.php.
- Oh, Cheol and Taejin, Kim (2010) “Estimation of rear-end crash potential using vehicle trajectory data”, Accident Analysis & Prevention 42 (6): pp.1888–93.
-Oh, Cheol, Park, Seri and. Ritchie, Stephen G. (2006) “A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors.” Accident Analysis & Prevention 38 (2): pp.295–301.
-Ozaki, H. [ed.] (1993) “Reaction and anticipation in the car-following behavior”,  In Transportation and Traffic Theory, Berkeley, California.
-Punzo, Vincenzo, Borzacchiello, Maria Teresa and Ciuffo, Biagio (2011) “On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) Program Data”, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 19 (6): 1243–62.
-Ranjitkar, Prakash, and Nakatsuji,  Takashi (2010) “A Trajectory based analysis of drivers’ response in car-following situations”,  In . http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=910337.
-Ratick, S. and G. Schwarz (2009) “Monte Carlo Simulation”,  In International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography, edited by Rob Kitchin and Nigel Thrift, pp.175–84. Oxford: Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080449104004764.
- Transportation Research Board of the National Academies (2013) “Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM)) core algorithms and data sets”, Accessed December 19. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=1226819.
-Wang, Xuesong and Abdel-Aty, Mohamed (2006) “Temporal and spatial analyses of rear-end crashes at signalized intersections”, Accident Analysis & Prevention 38 (6): pp.1137–50.
-Wu, Yi-hu, Yuan, Huihua , Chen, Haitao and Li, Jigjig (2009) “A study on reaction time distribution of Group Drivers at Car-Following.” In Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, 2009. ICICTA ’09, 3:452–55.
-Xu, Cheng, Tarko, Andrew, P., Wang, Wei and Liu, Pan (2013) “Predicting crash likelihood and severity on freeways with real-time loop detector data”, Accident Analysis & Prevention 57 (August): pp.30–39.
-Yu, Rongjie and Abdel-Aty. Mohamed (2014) “Analyzing crash injury severity for a mountainous freeway incorporating real-time traffic and weather data”, Safety Science 63 (March): pp.50–56.