Public Transport Ontology for Passenger Information Retrieval

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Research Scholar, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee and ScientistEngineer, Space Applications Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

2 Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

3 Professor and Head, Centre for Transportation Systems (CTRANS),Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee,,Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India

Abstract

Passenger information aims at improving the user-friendliness of public transport systems while influencing passenger route choices to satisfy transit user’s travel requirements. The integration of transit information from multiple agencies is a major challenge in implementation of multi-modal passenger information systems. The problem of information sharing is further compounded by the multi-lingual and multi-cultural population of developing countries such as India. Ontology, by explicit specification of conceptualisation, not only addresses the issues pertaining to syntactic interoperability arising due to widely varied system architectures and software used by different agencies, but also ensures semantic interoperability caused by cognitive and naming heterogeneity. This paper develops a domain-specific ontology for public transport systems, which is further integrated with the domain-ontology of urban features with an objective of supporting multi-modal public transport information retrieval. The ontology thus developed is formalised using Web Ontology Language. In order to evaluate the capability of ontology in passenger information retrieval, the proposed ontology is implemented for five regular bus service routes and one bus rapid transit route in Ahmedabad city. The study defines 1336 named individuals (instances of concepts in ontology) including 293 instances of urban features and 1043 instances of public transport features. The capability of ontology in supporting general service information queries, itinerary planning, and multimodal trip planning have also been demonstrated. The study concludes that the domain-specific public transport ontology when integrated with urban features ontology, not only enables sharing of data across multiple transit agencies, but also expands the search space for passenger route choices by sharing the meaning of information.

Keywords


- Agrawal, P. (2005) “Ontological considerations in GIScience.” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 501-536.

- Aifandopoulou, G., Ziliaskopoulos, A. and Chrisohoou, E. (2006) “A multi-objective optimum path algorithm for passenger pretrip planning in multimodal transportation networks.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2032, Issue 1, pp 26-34.

- Antoniou, G., and Harmelen F. (2008) A Semantic Web Premier, Second Edition, MIT Press, Cambridge.

- APTA. (2009) APTA TCIP-S-001 3.0.3 – APTA Standard for Transit Communications Interface Profiles, Version 3.0.3 Volume-III, TCIP XML Schema. American Public Transportation Association (APTA). Washington, DC.

- Berdier, C., and Roussey, C. (2007) “Urban ontologies: The Towntology prototype towards case studies.” In Ontologies for Urban Development Studies in Computational Intelligence, Vol. 16, pp. 143–155. Springer, Basel.

- Billen, R., Nogueras-Iso, J., López-Pellicer, F. J., and Vilches-Blázquez, L. M. (2011) “Ontologies in the Geographic Information sector.” in Falquet, G., Métral, C., Teller, J., and Tweed, C. (eds.), Ontologies in Urban Development Projects. Springer London.

- Casey, R. F. et al. (2000) Report No. DOT-VNTSCFTA-99-5: Advanced Public Transportation Systems: The State of the Art - Update 2000, Final Report to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge , MA.

- Cherry, C., Hickman, M., and Garg, A. (2006) “Design of a Map-Based Transit Itinerary Planner.” Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 2, 45-68.

- COST Action TU0801. (2012) “Semantic Enrichment of 3D City Models for Sustainable Urban Development: Urban Ontologies.” Last modified: April 19, 2012. http://semcity.unige.ch/semcity/doku.php/urban_ ontologies. -Department for Transport (DfT). (2013) “Public Transport XML Standards.” Last modified: March 22, 2013. http://www.dft.gov.uk/public transportdatastandards/.

- Fonseca, F., Egenhofer, M., Davis, C., and Borges, K. (2000) “Ontologies and knowledge sharing in Urban GIS.”, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp 232-251.

- Google Inc. (2013) “General Transit Feed Specification Reference.” Last modified: July 18, 2013. https:// developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference.

- Gruber, T. R. (1993) “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications”. Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, pp 199-220.

- Guarino, N., and Giaretta, P. (1995) “Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification.” In N. Mars (Ed.), Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing, IOS Press, Amsterdam.

- Horridge, M. (2009) A Practical Guide To Building OWL Ontologies Using Protege 4 and CO-ODE Tools, Edition 1.2. The University of Manchester.

- Houda, M., Khemaja, M., Oliveira, K., and Abed, M. (2010) “A public transportation ontology to support user travel planning.” in proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 19-21 May 2010, Nice, France.

- Kasturia S. and Verma A. (2010) “A Multi-Objective Transit Passenger Information System Design using GIS.” ASCE Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 136(1), pp.34-41.

- Kizoom, N., and Miller, P. (2008) A Transmodel based XML schema for the Google Transit Feed Specification with a GTFS / Transmodel comparison. Kizoom Ltd., London.

- Liu, S., Brewster, C. and Shaw, D. (2013) “Ontologies for Crisis Management: A Review of State of the Art in Ontology Design and Usability.” in proceedings of the 10th International ISCRAM Conference – BadenBaden, Germany.

- Lorenz, B., Ohlbach, H. J., and Yang, L. (2005) Report No. IST506779/Munich /A1-D4/D/PU/a1: Ontology of Transportation Networks. Reasoning on the Web with Rules and Semantics (REWERSE), Munich.

- Lozano, A., and Storchi, G. (2001) “Shortest viable Path Algorithm in Multimodal Networks”, Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 35, pp. 225-241.

- Modesti, P., and Sciomachen, A. (1998) “A Utility Measure for Finding Multiobjective Shortest Paths in Urban Multimodal Transportation Networks”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 111, pp. 495-508.

- NNRMS Standards Committee. (2005) ISRO: NNRMS: TR: 112: 2005 Committee Report, NNRMS standards: a national standard for EO images, thematic & cartographic maps, GIS databases and spatial outputs. NNRMS Secretariat, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), Govt. of India, Bangalore, India.

- OGC. (2012) OGC City Geography Mark-up Language (CityGML) Encoding Standard, Document Reference Number OGC 12-019. Open Geospatial Consortium.

- Peng, Z. R., and Huang, R. (2000) “Design and development of interactive trip planning for web-based transit information systems”, Transportation Research C: Emerging Technology 8: 409–425.

- Peng, Z.-R. and Kim, E. (2008) “A Standard-based Integration Framework for Distributed Transit Trip Planning Systems”, Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(1), pp 13-28.

- Peng, Z.-R., Zhao, T., and Zhang, C. (2011) “Geospatial Semantic Web Services: A Case for Transit Trip Planning Systems”, in Zhao, P. and Di, L. Geospatial Web Services: Advances in Information Interoperability. Information Science Reference, Hershey.

- Pretorius, A. J. (2004) “Ontologies Introduction and Overview.” Vrije Universitiet Brussels. -Radin S., Jackson, D., Rosner, D., and Peirce, S. (2002) Trip planning state of the practice. Report No. FTA-TRI-11-02.6. Federal Highway Administration, Washington D.C.

- SAE International. (2004) SAE J2354 - Message Set for Advanced Traveller Information System (ATIS), SAE International.

- Sengar, V. et al. (2007) “Robust Location Search from Text Queries.” in Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems, 07 - 09, November 2007, Seattle, Washington.

- TCPO. (2006) National Urban Information Systems (NUIS) Design and Standards, Town and Country Planning Organisation, Govt. of India, Ministry of Urban Development, New Delhi, India.

- Timpf, S. (2002) “Ontologies of Wayfinding: a Traveller’s Perspective”, Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 2, pp 9-33.

- Vuchic, V. R. (2005) Urban Transit: Operations, Planning and Economics. John Wiley & Sons Inc. New Jersey.

- Wang, J., Ding, Z., and Jiang, C. (2006) “An Ontologybased Public Transport Query System.” In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Semantics, Knowledge, and Grid (SKG 2005), 28-29, November 2005, Beijing, China.

- Watkins, K. E. (2010) “Explore: An Attraction Search Tool for Transit Trip Planning.” Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp 111-128.

- Yu, L. (2011) A Developer’s Guide to the Semantic Web. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

- Zang, C., Peng, Z.-R., Zhao, T., and Li. W. (2008) “Transformation of Transportation Data Models from Unified Modelling Language to Web Ontology Language.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2064, pp 81-89.

- Zografos, K. G., Androutsopoulos, K. N., and Spitadakis, V. (2009), “Design and Assessment of an Online Passenger Information System for Integrated Multimodal Trip Planning”, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 10(2), pp. 311-323.