Traffic Impact Assessment of Land Use Proposals: Fifty Years of Australian Experience

Document Type : Research Paper


1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Transport, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Emeritus Professor, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Sydney, Australia

3 Director, Urban Research and Planning (URaP), International, North Strathfield, NSW, Australia


A Traffic Impact Assessment (TIA) provides information on the projected traffic expected from a proposed development. A TIA also evaluates the impact of proposed development on the roadways in the immediate proximity of the proposed development. The TIA should identify potential traffic operational problems or concerns and recommend appropriate actions to reduce impacts. Draft traffic impact assessment (TIA) guidelines for various land uses in general, and for high traffic generating buildings in particular, were proposed in Iran in the middle of 2016. In formulating that report the Traffic Committee of the Iranian Building Engineering Order reviewed international experience, including that of Australia. Traffic impact assessment started in Australia in the 1960s when the traffic police exercised much authority in trying to prevent land-use developments from taking place abutting main roads. Concepts derived from queuing theory where the application of the mean service time to establish maximum traffic generation rates for a proposed development was introduced. Attached to that theory was the absorption capacity of a priority traffic stream. This latter one found its way into traffic engineering practice to provide a rational basis for assessing development applications. As experience accumulated the guidelines became refined and a second edition of Austroads’ traffic impact assessment was released in 2016. This paper presents the documentation which is expected from a developer, traffic models available to the consultants working for the developer, and importance of developer contributions require by the developer for changes to the surrounding transport network. To illustrate the process, a simple case study of a school expansion is provided. The steps taken to show the impact of an increase from 185 to 600 pupils in Sydney is illustrated. The process include traffic data collection on the surrounding streets to forecasting future traffic using appropriate models and community workshops. In the light of a practical case, the process then ends with proposing options to mitigate adverse traffic impacts of the development application.  The overall work illustrates the principles of TIA and to point to the onus on all developers to manage travel demands to achieve more sustainable outcomes from urban development.


-Adams, W. F. (1936) “Road traffic considered as a random time series”, Journal of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 4, pp. 121-131.
-Austroads (2008) “Guide to traffic management Part 11: Parking”,  AGTM11-08, Austroads, Sydney.
-Austroads (2016) “Guide to traffic management part 12: Traffic impacts of developments”, 2nd Edition. Austroads, Sydney.
-Black, J. (1981) “Urban transport planning: theory and practice”, Croom Helm, London and John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
-Black, J., C. Mason and K. Stanley (1999) “Travel demand management: an application by the university of New South Wales (UNSW) as a large trip generator”, Transport Engineering in Australia, Vol.4, pp. 61 – 72.
-Blunden, W. R. (1966) “On the traffic effects of frontage land uses on urban main roads and arterials. Proceedings, Australian Road Research Board, Vol. 3, Part 1, pp. 1-18.
-Blunden, W. R. and J. A. Black (1984) “The land-use/transport system”, 2nd Edition. Pergamon Press, Sydney.
-NAASRA (1970) “Guide to traffic engineering practice”, National Association of Australian State Road Authorities, Sydney.
-Naude, C., Lloyd , B. and Bennett,  P. (2016) “Development of the traffic impact estimation Tool for Small Intersection Projects”. Austroads Publication No. AP-R522-16, Austroads, Sydney, August.
-NSW Roads and Traffic Authority (2002) Guide to Traffic Generating Developments, Version 2.2. NSW Roads and Traffic Authority, Sydney, October.
-NSW RTA (1999) Sharing the Main Street. (NSW Roads and Traffic Authority, Sydney.
-Queensland Government, Department of Main Roads (2006) “Guidelines for assessment of road impacts of development. the state of Queensland (Department of Main Roads), Brisbane.
-San Jose, Silicon Valley (2009) “Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines”.
-Smith, E. A. and K. Tara (1990) Who Should Pay the Transportation Infrastructure Needed for New Developments? 15th ARRB Conference, Darwin, Northern Territories, 26 -31 August, 1990, Proceedings Part 1 – 7, pp. 17 – 31.
-Tanner, J. C. (1961) Theoretical Analysis of Delays at Uncontrolled Intersections. RRL Research Note RN 3937/JCT, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire.
-Tasmania. Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources Roads and Traffic Division (2007) “A framework for undertaking traffic impact assessments”. Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources, Roads & Traffic Division, Hobart, October.
-Tripp, Sir H. Alker (1942) “Town planning and road traffic”,  Edward Arnold, London.
-US Department of Transportation (2009) “structuring modeling and simulation analyses for evacuation planning and operations”, Department of Transportation, Washington, D. C.
-Urban Research and Planning (1999) “Environmental and planning assessment act 1979: Leichhardt Developer Contributions Plan – Transport and Access”,  URaP Pty Ltd, St Leonards, NSW.
-Vicroads (2015) “Supplement to Austroads Guide to Traffic Management - Part 12: Traffic Impacts on Developments (2009),  Vicroads, Melbourne.
-Western Australia, Department of Planning and Western Australian Planning Commission (2016) “Transport impact assessment guidelines”,  Western Australian Planning Commission, Perth, August.
-Wisconsin Department of Transport (2017), Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines.