Evaluating the Effect of Lucobit on Moisture Susceptibility and Mechanical Performance of Bitumen and Asphalt Mixtures

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Civil and Transportation Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 MSc. Grad ,School of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran.

3 MSc. Grad., Department of Civil and Transportation Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

The use of polymer in hot mix asphalt production has remarkably in recent decades. Destruction due to moisture in hot mix asphalt is of basic matters about flexible pavement durability. In recent decades different ways have been used to evaluate moisture Sensitivity of HMA which some of them are simple with low cost and some are complicated with more reliable results. In this research the effect of polymer Lucobit on striping was investigated and boiling test and image processing technic and modified Lottman test that is the most popular test for moisture sensitivity were executed. Marshall Test, indirect tensile strength and dynamic shear rheometer (DSR), were done as additional tests. The results show that use of this polymer has a remarkable positive effect on moisture sensitivity and has improved other parameters of bitumen and hot mix asphalt. The results showed that 2%, 4% and 6% Lucobit, by which the PG 58-** will be upgraded to PG 64-**, PG 70-** and PG 76-**, respectively. In addition, the addition of 6% Lucobit has led to improvement of high temperature performance by 14.7 ºC and enhancement of three grades from PG 58-** to PG76-**. Also, the addition of 6% Lucobit has led to enhancement complex modulus by an average of 53.7 %.

Keywords


-Anderson, D. A., Dukatz, E. L. and Petersen, J. C. (1982) “The Effect of antistrip additives on the properties of asphalt cement”, Proc., Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 51, p. 298.
-Behiry, A. E. A. E.-M. (2013) “Laboratory evaluation of resistance to moisture damage in asphalt mixtures”, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 351-363.
-Goli, A., Ziari, H. and Amini, A. (2016) “Evaluating the performance of crumb rubber modified binders used in Isfahan Province”, International Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 4, pp. 97-107.
-Gordon,  D. A. (2003) “Rheological properties of styrene-butadiene-styrene polymer modified road bitumens”, Fuel. Vol. 82, pp. 1709-1719.
-Guian, W., Zhang Y., Sun, K. and Yongzhong, F. (2002) “Rheological characterization of storage-stable sbs-modified asphalt”, Polym. Test. Vol. 21, pp. 295-302.
- Xie, Jun , Wu, Shaopeng,  Ling, Pang, Lin, Juntao and Zhu,  Zuhuang (2012) “Influence of surface treated fly ash with coupling agent on asphalt mixture moisture damage”,  Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 30, pp. 340–346.
- Kakara, Mohammad Rafiq,   Hamzah, Meor Otyhman and Valentine, Jan (2015) “A review on moisture damages of hot and warm mix asphalt and related investigations”,  Journal of Cleaner Production., Vol. 99, pp. 39–58
-Kiggundu, B. M. and Roberts, F. L. (1988) “Stripping in HMA mixtures: State-of-the-art and critical review of test methods”,  National Center for Asphalt Technology Auburn, AL.
-Kringos,  N. and  Scarpas, A. (2008) “Physical and mechanical moisture susceptibility of asphaltic mixtures”,  International Journal of Solids and Structures. Vol. 45, pp. 2671–2685.
-Kok, B. V. and Yilmaz, M. (2009) “The effects of using lime and styrene–butadiene–styrene on moisture sensitivity resistance of HMA”,  Construction and Building Materials,  Vol. 23, pp. 1999-2006.
-Lottman, R. P. (2001) “Predicting moisture- induced damage to asphaltic conevete”, Report NO. 192, Transportation Research Board, National Research council, Washington, D.C, NCHRP.
-Lu,  Q, and Harvey, J. T. (2006) “Laboratory evaluation of long-term effectiveness of antistripping additives”,  The 85th. Annual Meeting of The Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
-Mehrara, A. and Khodaii, A. (2015) “Evaluation of moisture conditioning effect on damage recovery of asphalt mixtures during rest time application”, Construction and Building Materials. Vol. 98, pp. 294–304.
-Moghadas Nejad, F., Arabani, M., Hamedi, Gh.H. and Azarhoosh, A. R. (2013) “Influence of using polymeric aggregate treatment on moisture damage in hot mix asphalt”,  Construction and Building Materials. Vol.47, pp.1523–1527
--Shakiba, M., Dabiri, M., Rashid K. Abu Al-Rub., Eyad A. Masad. and Dallas N. (2014). “Microstructural modeling of asphalt concrete using a coupled moisture–mechanical constitutive relationship”,  International Journal of Solids and Structures,  Vol. 51, No.25, pp. 4260–4279.
-Stroup-Gardiner,  M. and Newcomb,  D. E. (1996) “Asphalt modified by sbs triblock copolymer structures and properties”, Polym. Eng. Sci., Vol. 30,  pp. 1707-1723.
-Terrel, R. L. and Shute,  J. W. (1989) “Summary report on water sensitivity. SHRP-A/IR-89-003”,  Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
-Tunnicliff, D. G., and Root,  R. E. (1995) “NCHRP Report 373: Use of antistripping additives in asphaltic concrete mixtures: -Field Evaluation”,  TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
- Kim, Yong-Rak,  Zhang, Jun and Hoki Ban, Hoki (2012) “Moisture damage characterization of warm-mix asphalt mixtures based on laboratory-field evaluation”,  Construction and Building Materials.  Vol. 31, pp. 204–211